ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness of teaching: Jigsaw technique vs lecture for medical students' Physics course

Maryam Jafariyan, Mohammad Matlabi, Reza Esmaeili, Mojtaba Kianmehr

Maryam Jafariyan
Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran

Mohammad Matlabi
Department of Public Health, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

Reza Esmaeili
Department of Public Health, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

Mojtaba Kianmehr
Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran. Email: dr.mojtabakianmehr@chmail.ir
Online First: July 22, 2017 | Cite this Article
Jafariyan, M., Matlabi, M., Esmaeili, R., Kianmehr, M. 2017. Effectiveness of teaching: Jigsaw technique vs lecture for medical students' Physics course. Bali Medical Journal 6(3): 529-533. DOI:10.15562/bmj.v6i3.400


Background: Cooperative learning considered as one of the greatest innovations in the educational system. Jigsaw learning technique, one form of cooperative learning method, has been successfully used to improve academic achievement among students. The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of jigsaw technique with lecture-based teaching method for medical students’ physics course. Methods: A pretest was performed on the students to ensure their literacy. Relevant topics, i.e. bioelectricity (first subject) and application of electricity for diagnosis and treatment (second subject) were then presented to the two groups using mentioned methods. A questionnaire with a confirmed validity and reliability and a posttest were used to measure their learning and assess whether it was satisfactory or not. Results: The mean posttest scores differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001 for subject 1 and subject 2). More than 80% of the participants agreed or agreed with all the items that assessed their satisfaction with what they had learned in Jigsaw class. However, some of them were concerned about the sufficiency of their learning and their final score. Conclusions: Jigsaw learning technique is recommended as a proper method for teaching physics if the students’ concern about their final score can be resolved and the accuracy of the information conveyed to them is ensured.

References

Ahadiyan M. Introduction to educational technology. Tehran. Boshra Press.2007.

Gulpinar MA, Yegen BC. Interactive lecturing for meaningful learning in large groups. Medical Teacher. 2005; 27: 590-594.

Vallori AB. Meaningful learning in practice. Journal of education and human development.2014; 3: 199-209.

Wolff M, Wagner MJ, Poznanski S, Schiller J, Snten S. Not another boring lecture: engaging leaners with active learning techniques. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 48: 85-93.

Keramati MR, Hoseyni M. Effect of cooperative learning on academic performance in Physics. Journal of Psychology and Education. 2008; 2: 147-165.

Shabani H. Educational Skills (Methods and Techniques of teaching). Tehran: Samt Press. 2014:347-362.

Gillies RM. The effects of cooperative learning on Junior high school students during small group leraning. Learning and Instruction. 2004; 14: 197-213.

Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Stanne MB. Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. 2000. https://www.researchgate.net/.

Sharan Y. Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education. 2010; 45: 300-313.

Zakari E, Iksan Z. Promoting cooperative learning in science and mathematics education: a Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 2007; 3: 35-39.

Gocer A. A comparative research on the effectivity of cooperative learning method and jigsaw technique on teaching literary genres. Educational Research and Reviews. 2010; 5: 439-445.

Norintan AM. Learning through teaching and sharing in the Jigsaw classroom. Annual Malaya dent University. 2008; 15: 71-76.

Perkins DV, Saris RN. A Jigsaw classroom technique for undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology. 2001; 28:111-113.

Walker I, Crogan M. Academic performance, prejudice and Jigsaw classroom: new pieces to the puzzle. Journal of Coounity and Applied Social Psychology. 1998; 8: 381-393.

Doymus K. Teaching chemical equilibrium with the Jigsaw technique. Research in science Education. 2008, 38: 249-260.

Sahin A. Effects of Jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written expression course. Educational Research and Reviews. 2010; 5: 777-787.

Maftel G, Popescu FF. Teaching atomic Physics in secondary school with the jigsaw technique. Romanian Reports in Physics. 2012; 64: 1109-1118.

Kilic D. The effect of the Jigsaw technique on learning the concepts of the principles and methods of teaching. World Applied Sciences Journal.2008; 4: 109-114.

Adhami M, Marzban A. The effect of Jigsaw task on reading ability of Iranian intermediate high school students. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies. 2014; 4: 13-24.

Mengduo Q, Xiaoling J. Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative LearningTechnique: Focusing on the Language Learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly). 2010; 33: 113-125.

Doymus K, Karacop A, Simses U. Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on student's understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational technology research and dedelopment. 2010; 58:671-691.

Carpenter JM. Effective teaching methods for large classes. Journal of family and consumer sciences Educations. 2006; 24: 13-23.

Hanze M, Berger R. Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade Physics classes. Learning and instruction. 2007; 17: 29-41.


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 0
PDF Downloads : 0