Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The self-acceptance model improves the behavior of maintaining the quality of life after a hysterectomy

  • Raden Khairiyatul Afiyah ,
  • Faridah Umamah ,
  • Nanik Handayani ,
  • Rusdianingseh ,
  • Budi Prasetyo ,


Background: The loss of the uterus means the loss of one of the functions of a woman's life, namely the reproductive function. The impact of a hysterectomy will have a major influence on the quality of life; this can be seen in how to carry out life, such as activities, social relations and interactions with the environment. All of these things can lead to changes in daily behavior, namely changes in self-image that will lead to insecurity, withdrawn behavior, distrust of God and ultimately, self-injury behavior. This study analyzes the self-acceptance model's effect on maintaining the quality of life after a hysterectomy.

Methods: This type of research is an experiment to compare 2 design groups. This research was conducted for 4 weeks in May-June 2022, with a total sample of 12 respondents, with details of 6 respondents in the control group and 6 in the treatment group. The type of sampling used is non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling method. Data analysis used the Wilcoxon, and Mann Whitney marked rank test with a significance value of p < 0.05. The questionnaire used in this study was designed using a reference and behavioral theory approach with a reliability of 0.89 and a validity test that obtained a Cronbach alpha value of 0.86.

Results: The value of behavior of caring for sexual function after hysterectomy before intervention in the control group was 29.00±1.789, and after being given the intervention, the value changed to 29.33±0.816 (p=0.564). In the treatment group, the value of behavior of caring for sexual function after hysterectomy before the intervention was 28.50±1.225 and after the intervention was 33.83±2.639 (p=0.027). Behavioral analysis of caring for sexual function after hysterectomy before intervention in the control and treatment groups showed no difference (p=0.591). The self-acceptance model affects the behavior of maintaining the quality of life after hysterectomy in the control and treatment groups (p=0.006).

Conclusion: This study proves that the self-acceptance model affects the behavior of maintaining the quality of life after a hysterectomy.


  1. Afiyah RK, Wahyuni CU, Prasetyo B, Dwi Winarno D. Recovery time period and quality of life after hysterectomy. J Public health Res. 2020;9(2):1837. Available from:
  2. Nur’aini, Afiyanti Y, Setyowati. Sexual self-efficacy: Affection, sexual communication, and self-acceptance as significant factors related to sexual function on menopausal women in Indonesia. Enfermería Clínica. 2019;29:551–5. Available from:
  3. Chae Y-J, Kim Y-R, Lee O-S, Kim B-R, Ko Y-S, Han S-M, et al. The Relationship between Stress Coping, Spouse Support, Intentional Rumination and Post-traumatic Growth in Women with Hysterectomy. J Korea Converg Soc. 2020;11(8):237–45.
  4. Chou C-C, Lee T-Y, Sun C-C, Lin S-S, Chen L-F. Husbands' Experiences Before Wives' Hysterectomy. J Nurs Res. 2006;14(2):113–22. Available from:
  5. Ilknur AA, Birsen A, Busra A. Evaluation of relationships, self-evaluation and self-esteem of women's with histerectomy. Prog Heal Sci. 2016;6(2):7–13. Available from:
  7. Hoga LAK, Higashi AB, Sato PM, Bozzini N, Baracat EC, Manganiello A. Psychosexual Perspectives of the Husbands of Women Treated With an Elective Hysterectomy. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(9):799–813. Available from:
  8. Gercek E, Dal NA, Dag H, Senveli S. The information requirements and self-perceptions of Turkish women undergoing hysterectomy. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):165–70.
  9. Mahardika P, Setyowati S, Afiyanti Y. The holistic needs of women with hysterectomy: A grounded theory study. Enfermería Clínica. 2021;31:S24–8. Available from:
  10. Malyam V, Parameshwaraiah ST, Gopalkrishna V, Sannappa AC, Kumar V. QUALITY OF LIFE, SEXUAL SATISFACTION AND PSYCHIATRIC CO-MORBIDITY IN WOMEN POSTED FOR HYSTERECTOMY. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2018;7(26):2989–93. Available from:
  11. Sardeshpande N. Why do young women accept hysterectomy? Findings from a study in Maharashtra, India. Int J Innov Appl Stud. 2014;8(2):579–85. Available from:
  12. Bąk E, Marcisz C, Krzemińska S, Dobrzyn-Matusiak D, Foltyn A, Drosdzol-Cop A. Relationships of Sexual Dysfunction with Depression and Acceptance of Illness in Women and Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(9).
  13. Rowland DL, Adamski BA, Neal CJ, Myers AL, Burnett AL. Self-efficacy as a relevant construct in understanding sexual response and dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(1):60–71.
  14. Vasile C. An Evaluation of Self-acceptance in Adults. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013;78:605–9. Available from:
  15. Ajzen I. The Theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2(4):314–24. Available from:
  16. Wong LP, Arumugam K. Physical, psychological and sexual effects in multi-ethnic Malaysian women who have undergone hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(8):1095–105. Available from:
  17. Afiyah RK, Umbul Wahyuni C, Prasetyo B, Qomaruddin MB, Yunita Sari R, Faizah I, et al. Self-acceptance Affects Attitudes in Caring for Sexual Function after Hysterectomy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(G):293–6. Available from:
  18. Plotti F, Terranova C, Capriglione S, Crispino S, Li Pomi A, de Cicco Nardone C, et al. Assessment of Quality of Life and Urinary and Sexual Function After Radical Hysterectomy in Long-Term Cervical Cancer Survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(4):818–23. Available from:
  19. Fortin C, Hur C, Falcone T. Impact of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Quality of Life. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):219–32. Available from:
  20. Humalajärvi N, Aukee P, Kairaluoma M V, Stach-Lempinen B, Sintonen H, Valpas A, et al. Quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms after hysterectomy with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet & Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;182:16–21. Available from:
  21. Nicholson WK, Wegienka G, Zhang S, Wallace K, Stewart E, Laughlin-Tommaso S, et al. Short-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Hysterectomy Compared With Myomectomy for Symptomatic Leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):261–9. Available from:
  22. Fortin C, Flyckt R, Falcone T. Alternatives to hysterectomy: The burden of fibroids and the quality of life. Best Pract & Res Clin Obstet & Gynaecol. 2018;46:31–42. Available from:
  23. Brucker SY, Taran F-A, Bogdanyova S, Ebersoll S, Wallwiener CW, Schönfisch B, et al. Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(6):1141–9. Available from:
  24. Moshki M, Mohammadzadeh F, Dehnoalian A. The effectiveness of a group-based educational program on the self-efficacy and self-acceptance of menopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. J Women & Aging. 2017;30(4):310–25. Available from:

How to Cite

Afiyah, R. K., Umamah, F., Handayani, N., Rusdianingseh, & Prasetyo, B. (2023). The self-acceptance model improves the behavior of maintaining the quality of life after a hysterectomy. Bali Medical Journal, 12(2), 1264–1268.




Search Panel