Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine for cognitive dysfunction and antibody biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

  • Bantar Suntoko ,
  • Suharyo Hadisaputro ,
  • Handono Kalim ,
  • Suyanto Hadi ,
  • Fenda Aditia ,

Abstract

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/51QxGpETzG0

 

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to persistent inflammation, resulting in organ tissue damage. Cognitive dysfunction is one of the symptoms often found in NPSLE, and hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all levels of SLE from mild to severe. However, studies on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for cognitive dysfunction have not been studied. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of hydroxychloroquine administration on antibody levels and cognitive function in lupus patients with cognitive dysfunction.

Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted in patients with SLE who experienced cognitive dysfunction. The treatment group consisted of 20 subjects subjected to standard therapy along with a daily dosage of hydroxychloroquine (200 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Furthermore, the control group comprised 20 subjects who only received standard therapy. The primary outcome of this trial focused on the evaluation of MoCA-INA and sub-MoCA-INA scores, while the secondary outcome included the measurement of anti-NMDA, anti-β2-glycoprotein-1, anticardiolipin IgM and IgG antibodies, as well as lupus anticoagulant levels. Data analysis for unpaired variables used the independent t-test or the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: There was a relationship between giving hydroxychloroquine administration to increasing the sub-MOCA-INA attention score (p<0.05). However, there was no relationship between giving hydroxychloroquine to increasing MoCA-INA scores and decreasing biomarker levels of anti-NMDA, anti-β2-glycoprotein-1, IgM-IgG anticardiolipin, and lupus anticoagulant (p>0.05)

Conclusion: Administration of hydroxychloroquine only affected attentional MoCA-INA sub-scores but did not affect other MoCA-INA sub-scores, overall MoCA-INA scores, and antibody levels.

References

  1. Anić F, Žuvić-Butorac M, Štimać D, Novak S. New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus correlate with disease activity. Croat Med J. 2014;55(5):514–9.
  2. Suntoko B. Gambaran Klinik dan Diagnosis Lupus Eritematosus Sistemik. In: Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam PAPDI. VI. Jakarta: Interna Publishing; 2015. p. 3353–61.
  3. Sumariyono, Kalim H, Setyohadi B. Latar Belakang Lupus Eritematosus Sistemik. In: Diagnosis Dan Pengelolaan Lupus Eritematosus Sistemik. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Reumatologi Indonesia; 2019. p. 1–2.
  4. Gordon C, Amissah-Arthur M-B, Gayed M, Brown S, Bruce IN, D’cruz D, et al. The BSR and BHPR guideline for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. Rheumatol. 2018;57(1):e1–45.
  5. Benedict RHB, Shucard JL, Zivadinov R, Shucard DW. Neuropsychological impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comparison with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2008;18(2):149–66.
  6. Jeltsch-David H, Muller S. Autoimmunity, neuroinflammation, pathogen load: A decisive crosstalk in neuropsychiatric SLE. J Autoimmun. 2016;74:13–26.
  7. Schwartz N, Stock AD, Putterman C. Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions. Nat Rev Rheumatol.2019;15(3):137–52.
  8. Marín JD, Posso-Osorio I, Vargas S, Nieto-Aristizábal I, Ríos-Serna LJ, Tobón GJ. Antibodies associated with neuropsychiatric lupus: Pathophysiological role, prevalence and diagnostic usefulness. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2019;26(2):111–7.
  9. Katzav A, Shoenfeld Y, Chapman J. The pathogenesis of neural injury in animal models of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;38(2–3):196–200.
  10. Oláh C, Schwartz N, Denton C, Kardos Z, Putterman C, Szekanecz Z. Cognitive dysfunction in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):1–7.
  11. Seet D, Allameen NA, Tay SH, Cho J, Mak A. Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: immunopathology, clinical manifestations, neuroimaging and management. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(2):651–79.
  12. Schrezenmeier E, Dörner T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(3):155–66.
  13. Ponticelli C, Moroni G. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(3):411–9.
  14. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis JN, et al. 2019 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(6):736–45.
  15. Petri M, Naqibuddin M, Carson KA, Wallace DJ, Weisman MH, Holliday SL, et al. Depression and cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(10):2032–8.
  16. Saepudin A, Ong PA, Hidayat S, Rahmadi AR, Hamijoyo L. Correlation between cognitive function with disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study. Indones J Rheumatol. 2019;11(1):130–6.
  17. Willis R, Seif AM, McGwin G, Martinez-Martinez LA, González EB, Dang N, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine treatment on pro-inflammatory cytokines and disease activity in SLE patients: Data from LUMINA (LXXV), a multiethnic US cohort. Lupus. 2012;21(8):830–5.
  18. Richard SA, Kampo S, Hechavarria ME, Sackey M, Buunaaim ADB, Kuugbee ED, et al. Elucidating the Pivotal Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Potentials of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine. J Immunol Res. 2020;2020.
  19. Hanly JG, Hong C, Smith S, Fisk JD. A prospective analysis of cognitive function and anticardiolipin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(4):728–34.
  20. Massardo L, Bravo-Zehnder M, Calderón J, Flores P, Padilla O, Aguirre JM, et al. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and anti-ribosomal-P autoantibodies contribute to cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015;24(6):558–68.
  21. Tay SH, Mak A. Anti-NR2A/B antibodies and other major molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(5):10281–300.
  22. Fleetwood T, Cantello R, Comi C. Antiphospholipid syndrome and the neurologist: From pathogenesis to therapy. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1–13.
  23. Wang TF, Lim W. What is the role of hydroxychloroquine in reducing thrombotic risk in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies? Hematol (United States). 2016;2016(1):714–6.
  24. Emori A, Matsushima E, Aihara O, Ohta K, Koike R, Miyasaka N, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59(5):584-9.
  25. Jacobson MW, Rapport LJ, Keenan PA, Coleman RD, Tietjen GE. Neuropsychological deficits associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21(2):251–64.
  26. Kozora E, Erkan D, Zhang L, Zimmerman R, Ramon G, Uluǧ AM, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-negative systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) versus aPL-positive non-SLE patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(1):34–40.
  27. Coín MA, Vilar-López R, Peralta-Ramírez I, Hidalgo-Ruzzante N, Callejas-Rubio JL, Ortego-Centeno N, et al. The role of antiphospholipid autoantibodies in the cognitive deficits of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2015;24(8):875–9.
  28. Barilaro G, Coloma-Bazan E, Chacur A, Della Rocca C, Perez-Isidro A, Ruiz-Ortiz E, et al. Persistence of antiphospholipid antibodies over time and its association with recurrence of clinical manifestations: A longitudinal study from a single centre. Autoimmun Rev. 2022;21(12):103208.
  29. Kivity S, Agmon-Levin N, Zandman-Goddard G, Chapman J, Shoenfeld Y. Neuropsychiatric lupus: A mosaic of clinical presentations. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1–11.
  30. Yoshio T, Okamoto H. Pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric syndromes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Open J Rheumatol Autoimmune Dis. 2015;05(02):46–56.
  31. Petri M, Naqibuddin M, Sampedro M, Omdal R, Carson KA. Memantine in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41(2):194–202.
  32. Chakrabarti K, McCune WJ. Advances in the clinical use of hydroxychloroquine levels. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2022;34(3):151–7.
  33. McLaurin E, Holiday S. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2005;64:297–303.
  34. Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Su L, Bae SC, Gordon C, Wallace DJ, et al. Prospective analysis of neuropsychiatric events in an international disease inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):529–35.
  35. Govoni M, Hanly JG. The management of neuropsychiatric lupus in the 21st century: still so many unmet needs? Rheumatology. 2020;59:v52–v62.
  36. Sun R, Wang J, Feng J, Cao B. Zinc in cognitive impairment and aging. Biomolecules. 2022;12(7):1000.
  37. Sindhughosa DA, Somia IKA, Merati KTP, Suryana K. Adjunct therapy of zinc supplementation increases immunological response in HIV-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Open AIDS Journal. 2022;16: e187461362204120.
  38. Nurcahyo WI, Adhyatmoko GA, Kurniawan MF, Manapa CH, Wicaksono SA, Boom CE, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) in on-pump cardiac surgery patients at Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Semarang. Bali Med J. 2023;12(2):1713-7.
  39. Rahman BA, Airlangga PS, Saputra AN, Kriswidyatomo P, Salinding A, Hamzah, et al. Correlation of S100B level and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) events among patients with ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeries with controlled hypotension. Bali Med J. 2022;11(3):1860-4.

How to Cite

Suntoko, B., Suharyo Hadisaputro, Handono Kalim, Suyanto Hadi, & Fenda Aditia. (2023). A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine for cognitive dysfunction and antibody biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Bali Medical Journal, 12(2), 2264–2270. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i2.4619

HTML
3

Total
3

Share

Search Panel