ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Mini Health Technology Assessment of Urban and Rural Health Care in Indonesia

Ferdy Iskandar , Fabianto Santoso, Angela Franzeska, Yenna Tasia, Kamajaya Mulyana

Ferdy Iskandar
Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya Jakarta. Email: iskandar.ferdy@gmail.com

Fabianto Santoso
Universitas Indonesia

Angela Franzeska
Universitas Airlangga

Yenna Tasia
Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya Jakarta

Kamajaya Mulyana
Maranatha Christian University
Online First: October 03, 2018 | Cite this Article
Iskandar, F., Santoso, F., Franzeska, A., Tasia, Y., Mulyana, K. 2018. Mini Health Technology Assessment of Urban and Rural Health Care in Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal 7(3). DOI:10.15562/bmj.v7i3.932


Background: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a program to evaluate the use of technology in healthcare. HTA proposed by World Health Organization (WHO) will affect the government’s decision-making in the development of healthcare technology. The use of technology should be assessed from its cost-effectiveness to its potential ethical problems. HTA Unit – a division who organizes HTA in government in Indonesia – has emerged in ministry of health in 2003 and focused in drugs and vaccines problems. However, HTA in Indonesia has not been formally effective until today.

Objectives: To evaluate the usage, supply, and demand of the health technology and the spread of health technology in urban and rural areas.

Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study using questionnaire to gather quantitative and qualitative data. The respondents of this study are medical doctors in Indonesia, and the selection of the respondents is done consecutively. We divide respondents’ area into urban and rural areas, and health practitioners as field executors (general practitioners or GP and specialists) and head of healthcare facilities.

Results: The total samples are 48 health practitioners and 14 head of healthcare facilities. Statistical analysis shows that the two settings (urban and rural) are not significantly different (p=0.478), while descriptive analysis shows that the inadequacy of health technology is higher in rural than that in urban areas (70% VS 52.63%). The relationship between the field of health practitioners (GP and specialist) and the adequacy of health technology is not significant. More GP than specialists complain about the inadequacy of health technology in giving the health service to the patients. About 92.8% head of health facility said that technology is needed to support the health service, while only 35.71% agreed that their health facilities still have inadequate health technology.

Conclusion: The use of health technology in Indonesia is still inadequate. The spread of health technology is not equal in urban and rural areas. The lack of health technology in rural areas, especially for GP, affect in diagnosing and giving therapy to patients. The poor spread of technology in healthcare also make gap between health research and health clinical practice.

References

Sivala S.Health technology assessment in the Asia Pacific Region. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2009;25:196–201.

Yang B. The future of health technology assessment in healthcare decision making in Asia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27 (11):891-901.

Chen Y, Banta D, Tang Z. Health technology assessment development in China. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2009;25: 202–209.

Sivala S. Health technology assessment in Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2009;25:224–230.

Doaee SH, Olyaeemanesh A, Emami SH, Mobinizadeh M, Abooee P, Nejati M, et al. Development and implementation of health technology assessment: a policy study. Iranian J Publ Health. 2013;42:50-55.

WHO. Indonesia. Global atlas of medical devices. WHO; 2014.

KEMENKES. Rencana Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Kemenkes;2015

SEARO. Health in south-east Asia. A SEARO Newsletter. 2013;6(2):18.


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 0
PDF Downloads : 0